What did the 1917 Mexican Constitution outline?

What did the 1917 Mexican Constitution outline?

• A. Reforms for legal protections for workers and rights for Indigenous populations
• B. Abolition of monarchy
• C. Expansion of mining privileges for foreign companies
• D. No civil rights.

Answer: (A)

The main idea here is that the 1917 Mexican Constitution enshrined social reforms that came out of the Revolution, especially protections for workers and recognition of Indigenous communities. It lays out concrete labor rights—things like limits on working hours, wage standards, and the right to organize and bargain collectively—that were designed to improve conditions for the growing urban and industrial workforce. At the same time, it acknowledges Indigenous groups by recognizing their land and communal rights, giving communities a formal role in managing land and resources and helping to address long-standing inequalities. This is all part of a broader move to reassert Mexican sovereignty over natural resources and to create a more inclusive, reform-oriented legal framework. The other options don’t fit because the constitution did not move toward monarchy, it did not expand foreign mining privileges (in fact it limited foreign control in many areas), and it did establish civil rights rather than deny them.

The main idea here is that the 1917 Mexican Constitution enshrined social reforms that came out of the Revolution, especially protections for workers and recognition of Indigenous communities. It lays out concrete labor rights—things like limits on working hours, wage standards, and the right to organize and bargain collectively—that were designed to improve conditions for the growing urban and industrial workforce. At the same time, it acknowledges Indigenous groups by recognizing their land and communal rights, giving communities a formal role in managing land and resources and helping to address long-standing inequalities. This is all part of a broader move to reassert Mexican sovereignty over natural resources and to create a more inclusive, reform-oriented legal framework.

The other options don’t fit because the constitution did not move toward monarchy, it did not expand foreign mining privileges (in fact it limited foreign control in many areas), and it did establish civil rights rather than deny them.